Categories (Cases/Videos)
Implant Therapy
- Anterior/Esthetic (827/23)
- Implants (2264/129)
- Full Arch & Dentures (185/5)
- Failures (218/2)
- CBCT & CAD/CAM (119/8)
Surgical (Regenerative)
Restorative
Comprehensive Dentistry
- Periodontics (304/12)
- Endodontics (176/6)
- Orthodontics (254/3)
- Practice Management (35/1)
- Other (433/9)
Other
Anatomically guided Implant
Posted on 10.31.2014 10:14 AM
By Jorge Campos
In Implants
Same case of Dr. Ehab Moussa...
I was preparing for my students this images and saw the case prepared by our college Dr. Moussa.
Similar images, xrs.
See the distal socket filled with Miner oss and packed with PRF.
Why didn´t I do Socket Shield? Molar movility...
The patient is a Class III with no anterior guide, and disoclussion with 2nd mollar did the loosening.
Dr. Campos
Add a comment to the discussion on Anatomically guided Implant
Case has been added to your favorites.
Case has been removed from your favorites.
Thank you for your input. Your comment has been posted.
You are now following this member. You will get notified on any new topics posted by this member.
You are no longer following this member. You will not get notified on any new topics posted by this member.
Edit Comment
Comment has been updated.
12 Comments
Maurice Salama says on 10.31.2014 01:19 PM
Jorge; This is an excellent approach and wonderful documentation. This "limits" the GAP around the implant and still provides for stability and screw access down the center of the future restoration. Well done. Maurice
Juan Alberto Ruiz says on 10.31.2014 02:41 PM
Eihhhh Jorge you never stop, great case, doing magic to restore a second molar. Incredible. Thank you so much.
Jorge Campos says on 10.31.2014 03:06 PM
Hi Alberto!
Thanks for your kind words.
Usually we have to choose: mesial or distal socket.
This way is easy, simple and predictable.
Regards Alma.
Jorg3
Jorge Campos says on 10.31.2014 03:02 PM
The original idea as we know is from M. Hurzeler. But this case was ideal to document for my students.
The implant had thorough stability and was crown centered as well.
Thanks Mo.
Jorge
Charles Schwimer says on 10.31.2014 04:47 PM
Jorge. Excellent work! Did the opposing occlusion or expected buccal resorption influence your choice of implant position? Great documentation. Thank you for sharing. Chuck
Jorge Campos says on 10.31.2014 08:03 PM
Hi Chuck.
Not the oposite crown didn't influence nor the expected resorption of the buccal plate did.
Just ideal anatomical position. Function simply works.
Thanks for your comment.
Jorge
armando ponzi says on 10.31.2014 04:58 PM
Jorge,
a really great case of a great surgeon!
You're saying is a case to show to your student.
Here is one :): how thick is lingual bone wall how thick is vestibular one?
What are your expectation of bone vestibular loss?
Are you compesating that well enough with slight implant position and proper depth?
Digital planning may represnt a key for discussion about initial data.
What do you think about it?
Armando
Jorge Campos says on 10.31.2014 08:15 PM
Hi Armando.
Buccal wall is thick. 2 mm. At least and also lingual.
We know we will loose buccal bone but there is the external oblique line that will help. This is basal bone, that remains...longer than a thin buccal plate.
Yes digital diagnosis will help, but on this case we have the molar before xtraction. So we know what ee have to replace.
Regards.
Jorge
Ehab Moussa says on 10.31.2014 06:24 PM
Jorge,
Great skill, beautiful documentation and excellent outcome...AS USUAL !!
Best,
Ehab
Jorge Campos says on 10.31.2014 08:17 PM
Thanks Ehab!!
I uploaded this case because I see yours !!!
Thanks for inspiring...
Jorge
ashok gowda says on 11.01.2014 04:00 AM
Beautiful work Jorge.
Jorge Campos says on 11.01.2014 05:29 AM
Thanks Ashok!
Good Halloween to all.
Jorge