Actual (post-op) vs. Planned Implants in 3D

117 Rating(s).


Posted on By Salo Kegen In CBCT & CAD/CAM

In case you have a post-op CT, here you have a great way to see and evaluate in 3D the delta between the implants planned and the actual (real) implants positions.

In this link you have a description of the whole process: https://goo.gl/ZB7ehP

WHAT YOU NEED TO HAVE:
- The SIMPLANT .sof file (this is the actual file uploaded to SIMPLANT while ordering a guide)
- A post-op CT in DICOM format (no matter the denture status)

DISCLAIMER: This is not a recommendation to do an extra CT, it is intended for cases a post-op CT was performed anyway for other reasons.

Actual (post-op) vs. Plan

Add to Favorites
Add a comment to the discussion on Actual (post-op) vs. Planned Implants in 3D


Upload photos
1.  Photo Title:

2.  Photo Title:

Would you like to follow this post?
Case has been added to your favorites.
Case has been removed from your favorites.
Thank you for your input. Your comment has been posted.
You are now following this member. You will get notified on any new topics posted by this member.
You are no longer following this member. You will not get notified on any new topics posted by this member.
Edit Comment
1.  Photo Title:
Current Image:   Delete Image
2.  Photo Title:
Current Image:   Delete Image
Comment has been updated.

6 Comments

Interesting information.
Salo, Was your guide ST born or screwed to the bone directly?


Reply

This case was a full clearance (all teeth extracted) and bone supported, a fact that may explain the small discrepancies having to implant in the recently created sockets using an Universal SIMPLANT Guide (not a SAFE system). The CT scan was more than 12 months old (something we try not to do). No fixation screws were used. MIS and Adin implants implemented. I added the guide design pictures and cross-sections at the end of the web album.


Reply

Very interesting. What have you found about the accuracy of implant guides when comparing them with your post-op CBCT?
thanks Dr. Salama


Reply

I'm glad (and honored) you find it interesting. I'm a computer-oriented person (I'm not a dentist neither a dental technician), specialist in SIMPLANT software, DICOM, CAD/CAM. I hear all the time claims that "CT Guidance is not accurate enough compared to manual procedures" (mainly coming from those who do NOT use guidance...). I hope this technique will give a tool to prove guidance is... a good thing to have, but you need to know how to work and be aware of its limitations.


Reply

Hi Salo,
I can perfectly understand your point of view about planning and use of surgical stent.
On my opinion a team is needed to work on the project and should involve several competencies.
The 'digital accuracy' is a main skill on planning but not the only one required to achieve an end result that is ultimately clinical.
I'm on the way to show a digital film based on method you describe and it can be useful to refer to your address about software process to obtain it.
By the way, the second X-ray, should be performed using same voexel size and type of machine (Dentascan or CBCT) otherwise matching could not be executed.
I agree with your advice of not using the x-ray method for accuracy revaluation.


Reply

Of course I agree with all of your comments, I see myself part of the team you mentioned. It will be very nice to see your film. I'm skegen(at)gmail(dot)com. I added your suggestion to use the same CT scanner and settings to the webalbum. Thanks. --Salo


Reply


BioHorizons
DoWell Dental Products